CO129-512-5 Boxer Indemnity Settlement 21-5-1929 - 21-5-1929 — Page 21

19

burdensome tem in expendit we. I

might ferhaps be worth while in

concurring in off to suggest that

fara. I should include a statement

that we should see no

Bjection

5 Chinese fost raising a ban on

the security of a portion of who indemnity

for the payment

of

labour required

in construction

G\

loop- live at

Canton which, as

stated in fara 5

1

of 4 on 6 2921/29, would be an

bject clearly to the mutual advantage

of both Gools, and therefore

mitable one

a

to receive assistance

from the returned indemnity funds ? So froceed eark for 2 copies of

Sis G. Gründle wroked

62921 Lobe recurred

thim.

dest as sent

n. Martin 1/11/29

9. R. Martin